01Recommended
Acorns
Spare-change investing
- Round-ups
- Robo portfolios
17 Best Investment Apps of 2026
Acorns is best for spare-change investing, eToro for crypto and copy trading, and Fidelity for broad, low-cost long-term investing. Decide whether you want the app to automate deposits and portfolios or to give you direct control over trades, then check fees and account minimums against that choice.
Fact-checkedOur top 3 picks
Independent picks from our 2026 ranking. No paid placements.
02Best copy trading
eToro
Crypto and copy trading
- Copy trading
- Crypto
03Best overall
Fidelity
Overall investing
- Stocks and ETFs
- Fractional shares
Advertiser disclosure RaveReviews may earn a commission from links on this page. That never influences our scores or rankings. How we make money.
The RaveReviews AlgorithmSources, weights and method
How the score works
We collect published rankings in this category, normalize each placement to a 0–100 scale, weight the sources by category fit and recency, and average only the lists where a provider appears. The result is divided by 10 and rounded to one decimal.
- 01Collect the source rankings.
- 02Normalize every position.
- 03Weight the sources.
- 04Calculate the RaveReviews Algorithm score.
Sources used
Last reviewed 2026-11-02. 5 sources contributed to this ranking.
The ranking at a glanceScores, chart and shortlist shape
Score curve
How the top 10 scores fall from first to tenth.
#1#5#10
Top scores
The first five, scored out of 10.
What you need to know before you choose.
The best investment app depends on whether you want automation, active trading or a full-service brokerage. Compare fees, account minimums and the investments you can actually buy.
Add up the monthly subscription, advisory fee, trading spreads and fund expense ratios before funding an account. Confirm which account types are available and whether the app supports the assets you actually plan to hold.
What the research says.
This shortlist is built from published rankings, not a single editor's opinion. Here is the evidence behind the score.
17options reviewed
4.9average score
10.0top score
5authority sources
An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.
Key insights
17options reviewed
Compared on value, features, ease, support and reputation.
5weighted ranking factors
The same published model across every category.
0paid placements
Compensation never changes a score or a rank.
Money options ranked
17 options, scored on value, features, ease of use, support and reputation.
Acorns
RecommendedBest round-ups- Round-ups
- Robo portfolios
- IRA accounts
eToro
Best copy trading- Copy trading
- Crypto
- Fractional shares
Fidelity
Best overall- Stocks and ETFs
- Fractional shares
- Retirement accounts
Public
Best simple interface- Stocks and ETFs
- Fractional shares
- Bonds
Vanguard
Best index funds- Index funds
- ETFs
- Retirement accounts
Robinhood
Best for beginners- Stocks and ETFs
- Fractional shares
- IRA match
Charles Schwab
Best for advanced investors- Stocks and ETFs
- thinkorswim
- Research
Webull
Best active mobile trading- Charting
- Paper trading
- Extended hours
SoFi
Best all-in-one- Stocks and ETFs
- Banking
- IRA match
Wealthfront
Best robo-advisor- Robo portfolios
- Tax-loss harvesting
- Cash account
E*TRADE
Best hands-on platform- Stocks and ETFs
- Research
- Retirement accounts
M1 Finance
Best automated portfolios- Pie portfolios
- Auto-rebalancing
- Fractional shares
Betterment
Best goal tracking- Robo portfolios
- Goal tracking
- Tax optimization
Moomoo
Best free research- Research
- Charting
- Paper trading
Stash
Best for micro-investing- Fractional shares
- Themed portfolios
- Stock-Back card
Interactive Brokers
Best global access- Global markets
- Options and futures
- Professional tools
J.P. Morgan
Best bank integration- Stocks and ETFs
- Banking integration
- Research
Acorns is best for round-ups, with automatic spare-change investing and educational content.
10.0RaveReviews Algorithm
Compare the top options
The details that matter most, in one view.
| Offer | Acorns | eToro | Fidelity | Public |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RaveReviews Algorithm | 10.0 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 6.5 |
| Best for | Spare-change investing | Crypto and copy trading | Overall investing | Simple investing |
| Price | $4–$12/mo | $0 commissions | $0 commissions | $0 commissions |
| Highlight | Round-ups | Copy trading | Stocks and ETFs | Stocks and ETFs |
Showing the top 4 of 17 options. See every ranked option.
The questions buyers actually ask
Clear answers to the decisions that come after the shortlist.
What is the best choice in investment apps?
If you want the short answer, start with Acorns. It earned a 10.0 out of 10 in our 2026 ranking, and it is the option we would shortlist first for spare-change investing. That does not mean it is the right choice for every reader. It means it is the most defensible place to begin.
The ranking is a shortlist, not a finish line. The right option depends on the job you need done, the total cost after fees and the support you will actually use. eToro is the stronger fit for crypto and copy trading. Fidelity is worth a close look for overall investing. Start with the top pick, then compare the runner-up on the details that change your decision.
Most buyers do not need the longest feature list. They need a clear answer to a smaller question. What will this cost over a year? What happens when something goes wrong? Can I leave without a penalty? Those questions separate a good shortlist from a good decision.
How did we rank investment apps?
We used the same five-factor model across this category. Features at 30%, price at 25%, ease of use at 20%, support at 15%, reputation at 10%. The weights are published because a score without a method is just a vibe with a decimal point.
The process starts with the evidence a buyer can actually check. We review provider materials, published pricing, contract terms and the support model. Then we compare the details that tend to cause regret later. A low headline price does not count for much if the service fee, cancellation term or coverage limit undoes it.
We also separate popularity from quality. A brand can be everywhere and still be a poor fit for your situation. The ranking rewards fit, not advertising spend. That is why the top pick may not be the most famous name on the page.
What should you look for in investment apps?
Start with the features that affect your actual use case. For Acorns, the relevant details include round-ups, robo portfolios, ira accounts. Those are not decoration. They are the parts of the product that determine whether it works on a normal Tuesday, not just on the day you sign up.
Then look at the terms. Price is easy to compare. Contract length, service fees, cancellation rules, support hours and eligibility are harder. They are also where most of the real cost hides. Ask for the total annual cost, not the monthly teaser. Ask what happens if you need to cancel, move or change the plan.
Finally, check the track record. A provider that answers a sales call quickly may be slow when you need help. Read recent reviews, look for patterns and ask how disputes are handled. The best time to learn how a company behaves is before you depend on it.
How much do investment apps cost?
Acorns starts at $4–$12/mo Bronze to Gold. eToro starts at $0 commissions spread costs apply. Fidelity starts at $0 commissions $0 account minimum. Those prices are a starting point, not a full budget. The final number depends on the plan, the contract, the add-ons and where you live.
Here is the part most shoppers miss. The cheapest monthly price is often the most expensive decision. A low rate with a long contract, a large service fee or a narrow coverage set can cost more than a higher headline price with clean terms. Compare the total cost over the period you expect to use the product.
Set a budget before you compare. Then decide which features are worth paying for. If you cannot explain why an upgrade matters to your actual use, it is probably not an upgrade. It is a sales feature.
Which option is best for spare-change investing?
Acorns is the pick here because acorns is best for round-ups, with automatic spare-change investing and educational content.. It is not the cheapest option in the category, and it is not trying to be. It is the option that makes the fewest compromises where the decision matters most.
That recommendation comes with a condition. If your priority is different, the ranking should change. A reader who needs the lowest possible upfront cost should look at the value pick. A reader who needs hands-on support should pay attention to service quality. The best answer is always relative to the job.
Use the top pick as a benchmark. Compare every other option against it on price, terms and the one feature you cannot do without. If another option wins on those three points, it deserves a closer look.
Which option is best for crypto and copy trading?
eToro is the alternative we would hand to most readers who do not fit the top pick. It scored 8.9 out of 10 and is best for crypto and copy trading. The gap between first and second is usually smaller than the marketing suggests.
A runner-up is not a consolation prize. It is often the better answer for a specific reader. Maybe the price is cleaner. Maybe the support model fits the way you work. Maybe the contract is shorter. Those details matter more than a tenth of a point in a score.
Read the review, check the current terms and compare the total cost. If the second option wins on the details that affect you, choose it without hesitation. The ranking is an input, not an instruction.
Which option is best for overall investing?
Fidelity is the option to check when overall investing is the priority. It earned 7.8 out of 10 and gives readers a different set of trade-offs. That is useful. A shortlist with only one kind of answer is not a shortlist.
When you compare the third option, focus on the reason it exists. What does it do better than the top two? What does it give up? The answer is usually a trade between price, flexibility, speed or support. None of those trade-offs are free.
If you are unsure, put the top three in a simple table. List the total annual cost, the contract term and the one feature you need most. The right choice is the row that creates the fewest problems after the purchase.
How should you compare the top options?
Put the top three in a simple table. One column for the total annual cost. One for the contract term. One for the feature you cannot do without. Then add a column for the support you expect to use. That table will tell you more than another hour of browsing.
Do not compare the marketing labels. Compare the mechanics. What happens when you need help? What does it cost to leave? What is included at the price you will actually pay after the introductory period? Those questions expose the real difference between options that look similar on a sales page.
Then ask a blunt question. If the top pick disappeared tomorrow, which option would you choose? Your answer is the real runner-up. If you cannot answer, you do not have a shortlist yet. You have a list of tabs.
What is the biggest mistake buyers make?
The biggest mistake is shopping by headline price alone. It feels rational. It is easy to compare. It is also incomplete. A lower monthly number can hide a longer contract, a higher service fee, a narrower set of features or a support model that will frustrate you later.
The second mistake is buying for the person you wish you were. You do not need the enterprise plan if you run a small team. You do not need every add-on if you will use two of them. You need the option that fits the life you actually have, not the one in the sales demo.
The third mistake is waiting for perfect information. You will never have it. Set your must-haves, compare the total cost and choose the option that makes the next year easier. Then move on. A good decision made on time beats a perfect decision made too late.
What should you verify before you buy?
Verify the total cost, not the promotional price. Ask for the monthly cost after any introductory period ends. Ask about setup fees, service fees, cancellation fees and anything that changes when you add a user, a location or a feature. The number you see in an ad is rarely the number you will pay in month twelve.
Verify the terms that are easy to miss. Contract length, renewal rules, data practices and support hours matter more than most buyers expect. If the provider cannot explain them clearly before the sale, assume the answer will be harder to get afterward.
Verify the fit with your actual workflow. A demo can make any product look simple. A free trial or a short pilot can show you what the product feels like on a normal day. Use the trial to test the one feature you need most. That is a better use of time than touring every menu.
Do you need the most expensive option?
Usually, no. The most expensive option is built for a buyer with more complexity, more risk or more need for support. If that is not you, you are paying for capacity you will not use. That is not a status symbol. It is a worse budget.
The better question is not “what is the best?” It is “what is the least I can spend without creating a problem I will regret?” That question forces you to name the must-haves. It also makes the upgrade decision obvious. If an upgrade does not remove a real problem, it is optional.
Spend on the parts that are hard to fix later. Coverage, contract flexibility, security and support are difficult to bolt on after the fact. Fancy extras are usually easier to add later or live without.
What should you do next?
Start with the top pick and read the full review. Then compare the runner-up on the three details that matter most to you. If you are still unsure, use the comparison table and the methodology on this page. The goal is not to keep researching forever. The goal is to make a decision you can explain.
Before you sign up, confirm the current price, the contract term and the cancellation policy directly with the provider. Prices change. Terms change. A ranking can point you in the right direction, but the final check has to happen at the source.
If this ranking helped you narrow the list, stop there. A shortlist of two or three good options is enough. The best decision is the one you can act on with confidence, not the one that keeps you in the research phase for another month.
Who wrote and reviewed this ranking
Every ranking has a named editor and a separate quality review before publication.
David Krug
Head of Content
David leads the RaveReviews editorial team, turning research into clear comparisons and useful guides. He oversees content strategy, testing standards and the final read on every ranking.
LinkedIn
Annie Membreve
Head of Quality Control
Annie runs quality control at RaveReviews, checking sourcing, scoring and the details readers rely on. She reviews every ranking before publication and manages corrections.
TikTokFrequently asked questions
How did RaveReviews compare investment apps?
We compared 17 investment apps on features, price, ease of use, support and reputation. The ranking is a shortlist for further research, not a guarantee of fit.
What should I compare first?
Start with the job you need done, then compare total cost, contract terms, support and the features you will actually use. The cheapest option is not always the best fit.
How often are these rankings updated?
We review rankings when pricing, features or provider terms change. Check the updated date at the top of the page before relying on a specific price or offer.
Keep comparing
More rankings and guides for the decision in front of you.